首页> 外文OA文献 >The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective
【2h】

The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective

机译:合力永不褪色?从欧洲比较和定量的角度看波兰的大学治理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper studies the applicability of theoretical models of university governance from the international research literature to the Polish system. In particular, it is to test the applicability of a collegial model in the Polish case. The research question was ‘to what extent is a collegial model reflected in actual governance patterns found in the Polish university sector’. This is based on large-scale internationally comparable quantitative material. The empirical evidence for it comes from 3700 returned surveys inPoland (and more than 17,000 in eleven European countries) produced for two international research projects focused on the academic profession (CAP: “Changing Academic Profession” and EUROAC: “TheAcademic Profession in Europe”). This paper concludes that Polish universities are operating according to the traditional collegial model of the university as a “community of scholars” to an extent that isunparalleled in Western Europe. A detailed study of selected variables and specifically constructed indexes indicates that the defining feature of Polish academia today is the power of academic collegial bodies. The influence of collegial bodies on academic decision-making in Poland is the highest in Europe; and, in contrast, the power of the government and external stakeholders is the lowest. However, academics, sharing the “republic of scholars” institutional vision of the university, and still highlyinfluential in university decision-making, are currently confronted with higher education reforms grounded in an instrumental vision of the university (in which it is a tool for national political agendas). Consequently, powerful value-driven clashes between the academic community and the community ofpolicymakers and reformers are to be expected to intensify. The major theoretical concepts used in this paper come from Johan P. Olsen’s, Ian McNay’s and Robert Birnbaum’s studies of university governance,and its findings are presented from a European comparative and quantitative perspective.
机译:本文研究了从国际研究文献到波兰制度的大学治理理论模型的适用性。尤其是要测试合议模式在波兰案中的适用性。研究的问题是“大学模式在多大程度上反映了波兰大学界的实际管理模式”。这是基于大规模的国际可比定量材料。经验证据来自在波兰进行的3700份返回调查(在11个欧洲国家中有17,000份以上),这些调查是针对两个专注于学术专业的国际研究项目(CAP:“改变学术专业”和EUROAC:“欧洲学术专业”)进行的。本文的结论是,波兰大学作为“学者共同体”正在按照大学传统的大学模式运作,这在西欧是无与伦比的。对选定变量和专门构建的指标的详细研究表明,当今波兰学术界的主要特征是学术机构的力量。在波兰,大学机构对学术决策的影响最大。相反,政府和外部利益相关者的权力最低。但是,与大学有着共同的“学者共和国”制度构想但仍然在大学决策方面具有很大影响力的学者们目前正面临着以大学的工具构想为基础的高等教育改革(在这种改革中,这是国家政策的工具)。政治议程)。因此,预计将加剧学术界与决策者和改革者之间价值驱动的冲突。本文使用的主要理论概念来自Johan P. Olsen,Ian McNay和Robert Birnbaum对大学治理的研究,其发现是从欧洲的比较和定量角度提出的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kwiek, Marek;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号